From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Santhosh Kumar K" <s-k6@ti.com>,
broonie@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at,
vigneshr@ti.com, pratyush@kernel.org, mwalle@kernel.org,
takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
praneeth@ti.com, sebin.francis@ti.com, u-kumar1@ti.com,
srikanth.boyapally@amd.com, m-shah@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 11/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for direct reads
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 11:27:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-198946@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105105832.2134313-12-s-k6@ti.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] spi: cadence-quadspi: state leak on disable timeout in cqspi_tune_phy_read()
- [High] spi: cadence-quadspi: silent base-clock fallback during PHY tuning in cqspi_read()
- [High] spi: cadence-quadspi: missing READCAPTURE_EDGE bit in cqspi_tune_phy_read()
--
commit feb139507791ba27ec4dfd5612d622bfad619500
Author: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for direct reads
This commit enables PHY mode around direct-mode DMA reads when PHY tuning has
succeeded and the operation requests the post-config clock rate. It also adds
fallback logic to drop the clock to the base rate when a read cannot use the
tuned PHY.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> index c324451a9a285..55c446f4245af 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1075,6 +1076,105 @@ static int cqspi_resync_dll(struct cqspi_st *cqspi)
[ ... ]
> +static int cqspi_tune_phy_read(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata, bool enable)
> +{
> + struct cqspi_st *cqspi = f_pdata->cqspi;
> + void __iomem *reg_base = cqspi->iobase;
> + u32 reg;
> + u8 dummy;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Wait for idle before touching CONFIG/RD_INSTR either direction. */
> + ret = cqspi_wait_idle(cqspi);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!enable) {
> + cqspi_phy_restore_read_config(f_pdata);
> + return 0;
> + }
[Severity: High]
As reported by Sashiko on v10 [1], when cqspi_direct_read_execute() calls
cqspi_tune_phy_read(f_pdata, false) after cqspi_direct_read_dma() and
cqspi_wait_idle() times out, returning early before the !enable check skips
cqspi_phy_restore_read_config().
Doesn't this leave CQSPI_REG_CONFIG_PHY_EN and CQSPI_REG_CONFIG_PHY_PIPELINE
asserted in CQSPI_REG_CONFIG, CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE programmed with the PHY
capture settings, and the decremented dummy cycle count in CQSPI_REG_RD_INSTR
for subsequent untuned transfers?
> +
> + ret = cqspi_phy_reprogram_dll(f_pdata);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + cqspi_readdata_capture(cqspi, !f_pdata->use_dqs, f_pdata->use_dqs,
> + f_pdata->phy_setting.read_delay);
[Severity: High]
During PHY calibration, cqspi_phy_apply_setting() sets
BIT(CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE_EDGE_LSB) in CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE before each
pattern read:
drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c:cqspi_phy_apply_setting() {
reg = readl(cqspi->iobase + CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE);
reg |= BIT(CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE_EDGE_LSB);
writel(reg, cqspi->iobase + CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE);
...
}
When calibration finishes, cqspi_phy_post_config() clears that bit to restore
the non-PHY state:
drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c:cqspi_phy_post_config() {
...
reg = readl(reg_base + CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE);
reg &= ~BIT(CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE_EDGE_LSB);
writel(reg, reg_base + CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE);
...
}
However, cqspi_tune_phy_read() and cqspi_readdata_capture() never set or
restore BIT(CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE_EDGE_LSB). Won't all runtime PHY direct
reads execute with CQSPI_REG_READCAPTURE_EDGE_LSB cleared, even though the
PHY delay settings were calibrated with that bit set?
[ ... ]
> @@ -1622,26 +1730,66 @@ static void cqspi_memcpy_fromio(const struct spi_mem_op *op, void *to,
> memcpy_fromio(to, from, count);
> }
>
> +static int cqspi_direct_read_fallback(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
> + const struct spi_mem_op *op,
> + unsigned long max_speed_hz,
> + u32 post_config_max_speed_hz)
> +{
> + struct cqspi_st *cqspi = f_pdata->cqspi;
> + loff_t from = op->addr.val;
> + size_t len = op->data.nbytes;
> + u_char *buf = op->data.buf.in;
> + unsigned long configured_sclk = cqspi->sclk;
> + bool reclock = op->max_freq == post_config_max_speed_hz &&
> + configured_sclk != max_speed_hz;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /* Drop to the safe rate for this untuned transfer; PHY isn't used. */
> + if (reclock)
> + cqspi_configure(f_pdata, max_speed_hz);
> +
> + if (!cqspi->rx_chan || !virt_addr_valid(buf) ||
> + len < CQSPI_PHY_MIN_DIRECT_READ_LEN)
> + cqspi_memcpy_fromio(op, buf, cqspi->ahb_base + from, len);
> + else
> + ret = cqspi_direct_read_dma(f_pdata, buf, from, len);
> +
> + if (reclock)
> + cqspi_configure(f_pdata, configured_sclk);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int cqspi_direct_read_execute(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
> const struct spi_mem_op *op,
> + unsigned long max_speed_hz,
> u32 post_config_max_speed_hz)
> {
> struct cqspi_st *cqspi = f_pdata->cqspi;
> loff_t from = op->addr.val;
> size_t len = op->data.nbytes;
> u_char *buf = op->data.buf.in;
> + int ret;
>
> - if (!cqspi->rx_chan || !virt_addr_valid(buf) ||
> - len < CQSPI_PHY_MIN_DIRECT_READ_LEN) {
> - cqspi_memcpy_fromio(op, buf, cqspi->ahb_base + from, len);
> - return 0;
> - }
> + if (!cqspi_use_tuned_phy(f_pdata, op, post_config_max_speed_hz) ||
> + !cqspi->rx_chan || !virt_addr_valid(buf) ||
> + len < CQSPI_PHY_MIN_DIRECT_READ_LEN ||
> + !IS_ALIGNED(from, 16) || !IS_ALIGNED(from + len, 16))
> + return cqspi_direct_read_fallback(f_pdata, op, max_speed_hz,
> + post_config_max_speed_hz);
[Severity: High]
During PHY calibration via cqspi_am654_ospi_execute_tuning(), pattern
verification reads go through cqspi_phy_check_pattern() -> cqspi_exec_mem_op()
-> cqspi_mem_process() -> cqspi_read() -> cqspi_direct_read_execute().
If DMA is not available (!cqspi->rx_chan), direct mode is disabled
(!cqspi->use_direct_mode), or f_pdata->phy_read_op.addr.val is not 16-byte
aligned or exceeds cqspi->ahb_size, won't every calibration read silently fall
back to cqspi_direct_read_fallback() (or the indirect read path in
cqspi_read()) and drop the clock from post_config_max_speed_hz to
max_speed_hz without running cqspi_tune_phy_read()?
That would evaluate the entire PHY delay sweep at the slow base clock rate,
falsely report tuning success, and promote read_op->max_freq and
write_op->max_freq to post_config_max_speed_hz with uncalibrated tap settings.
Should cqspi_am654_ospi_execute_tuning() verify that direct DMA reads can be
used for the calibration pattern before starting tuning, or should fallback
reads be rejected while cqspi->phy_tuning_active is set?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260929063529.1235417-12-s-k6@ti.com
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261105105832.2134313-1-s-k6@ti.com?part=11
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 10:58 [PATCH v11 00/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 01/19] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 16:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 16:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 02/19] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-phy-pattern-partition property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 16:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 03/19] spi: parse spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz into post_config_max_speed_hz Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 11:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 04/19] spi: spi-mem: teach spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() about post-config ops Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 11:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 05/19] spi: spi-mem: add execute_tuning callback and spi_mem_execute_tuning() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 06/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: move cqspi_readdata_capture earlier Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 07/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: add DQS support to read data capture Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 08/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 11:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 09/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: skip DDR PHY tuning for 2-byte-address ops (i2383) Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 10/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: refactor direct read path for PHY support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 11/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for direct reads Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 11:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 12/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 11:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 13/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram CS timing on every chip-select switch Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 14/19] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram PHY DLL on runtime resume Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 15/19] mtd: spinand: extract variant ranking logic into spinand_op_find_best_variant() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 16/19] mtd: spinand: negotiate optimal controller operating point before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 11:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 17/19] mtd: spi-nor: extract read op template construction into helper Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 18/19] mtd: spi-nor: run controller optimization before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
2026-11-05 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 19/19] mtd: spi-nor: reset max_read_op frequency for security register reads Santhosh Kumar K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-198946@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m-shah@ti.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=praneeth@ti.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-k6@ti.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sebin.francis@ti.com \
--cc=srikanth.boyapally@amd.com \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox