From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gabor Juhos" <j4g8y7@gmail.com>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Md Sadre Alam" <md.alam@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Sricharan Ramabadhran" <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>,
"Varadarajan Narayanan" <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] spi: spi-qpic-snand: use the common qcom_nandc_config_cw_write() function
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 19:45:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-205501@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109-qpic-snand-use-common-functions-v1-4-1e8601e2db84@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not
introduce:
- [Critical] spi: qpic-snand: improper raw OOB write handling in
qcom_spi_program_execute() [1]
--
commit 31ce15b93da7dda82ea19398b4abcc5e1c175880
Author: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>
spi: spi-qpic-snand: use the common qcom_nandc_config_cw_write() function
This commit replaces the local qcom_spi_config_cw_write() helper with the
common qcom_nandc_config_cw_write() function from qpic_common.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c b/drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c
> index a825bdb93a8a1..6774a0a5db2a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1271,7 +1260,7 @@ static int qcom_spi_program_oob(struct qcom_nand_controller *snandc,
> oob_buf, 0, snandc->qspi->mtd->oobavail);
> qcom_nandc_config_page_write(snandc);
> qcom_write_data_dma(snandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, snandc->data_buffer, data_size + oob_size, 0);
> - qcom_spi_config_cw_write(snandc);
> + qcom_nandc_config_cw_write(snandc);
>
> ret = qcom_submit_descs(snandc);
> if (ret) {
[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but does qcom_spi_program_oob()
[1] silently discard raw OOB writes such as bad block markers from
spinand_markbad()?
spinand_markbad() issues a raw OOB write with datalen = 0, ooblen = 2, and
mode = MTD_OPS_RAW, which sets page_rw = false, oob_rw = true, and
raw_rw = true in qcom_spi_ecc_prepare_io_req_pipelined(). However,
qcom_spi_program_execute() ignores raw_rw when page_rw is false and routes
the write to qcom_spi_program_oob():
drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c:qcom_spi_program_execute() {
if (snandc->qspi->page_rw && snandc->qspi->raw_rw)
return qcom_spi_program_raw(snandc, op);
if (snandc->qspi->page_rw)
return qcom_spi_program_ecc(snandc, op);
if (snandc->qspi->oob_rw)
return qcom_spi_program_oob(snandc, op);
...
}
qcom_spi_program_oob() sets oob_buf to snandc->qspi->data_buf (the start of
the page buffer rather than the OOB offset) and unconditionally enables ECC
via ecc_cfg->ecc_bch_cfg. As a result, mtd_ooblayout_get_databytes() reads
0xff instead of the bad block marker and programs it to flash with ECC
enabled, leaving defective blocks unmarked and allowing subsequent writes to
failing blocks.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-da37c243-e4f1-4870-8190-46ae2f5b3282
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109-qpic-snand-use-common-functions-v1-0-1e8601e2db84@gmail.com?part=4
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 19:41 [PATCH 0/7] spi: spi-qpic-snand: use generic code from the 'qpic_common' module Gabor Juhos
2026-11-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] spi: spi-qpic-snand: use the common qcom_nandc_check_flash_errors() function Gabor Juhos
2026-11-10 23:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] spi: spi-qpic-snand: use the common qcom_nandc_config_page_read() function Gabor Juhos
2026-11-10 23:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] spi: spi-qpic-snand: use the common qcom_nandc_config_page_write() function Gabor Juhos
2026-11-10 23:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] spi: spi-qpic-snand: use the common qcom_nandc_config_cw_write() function Gabor Juhos
2026-11-09 19:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] spi: spi-qpic-snand: use the common qcom_nandc_set_read_loc_first() function Gabor Juhos
2026-11-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] spi: spi-qpic-snand: use the common qcom_nandc_set_read_loc_last() function Gabor Juhos
2026-11-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] spi: spi-qpic-snand: use the common 'qcom_nandc_read_stats' structure Gabor Juhos
2026-11-10 18:46 ` [PATCH 0/7] spi: spi-qpic-snand: use generic code from the 'qpic_common' module Mark Brown
2026-11-10 21:18 ` Gabor Juhos
2026-11-10 23:50 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-205501@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=j4g8y7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=md.alam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=quic_srichara@quicinc.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox