From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mehmet Fide" <mehmet.fide@gmail.com>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Stefan Agner" <stefan@agner.ch>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Boris Brezillon" <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"Alexey Klimov" <alexey.klimov@linaro.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, mehmet.fide@screeningeagle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: return an error when a command times out
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 19:30:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-214971@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114192031.959376-4-mehmet.fide@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: -ETIMEDOUT swallowed in
vf610_nfc_read_page()
--
commit 74e97975b0439f2b30c793e3dba498249fb4705a
Author: Mehmet Fide <mehmet.fide@screeningeagle.com>
mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: return an error when a command times out
This commit returns -ETIMEDOUT from vf610_nfc_done() on command timeout and
propagates the error through vf610_nfc_run(), vf610_nfc_cmd(), and the page
read and write hooks.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c
> index 547eb15138939..d6d4a18432ce8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -572,7 +577,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> int trfr_sz = mtd->writesize + vf610_nfc_spare_size(mtd);
> u32 row = 0, cmd1 = 0, cmd2 = 0, code = 0;
> - int stat;
> + int stat, ret;
>
> vf610_nfc_select_target(chip, chip->cur_cs);
>
> @@ -587,8 +592,10 @@ static int vf610_nfc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> cmd2 |= code << CMD_CODE_SHIFT;
>
> vf610_nfc_ecc_mode(nfc, nfc->ecc_mode);
> - vf610_nfc_run(nfc, 0, row, cmd1, cmd2, trfr_sz);
> + ret = vf610_nfc_run(nfc, 0, row, cmd1, cmd2, trfr_sz);
> vf610_nfc_ecc_mode(nfc, ECC_BYPASS);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
[Severity: Medium]
Does vf610_nfc_read_page() swallow -ETIMEDOUT when a timeout occurs during
the raw re-read in vf610_nfc_correct_data()?
When hardware ECC reports a decode failure (such as on an erased page),
vf610_nfc_correct_data() re-reads the page and OOB via nand_read_page_op()
and nand_read_oob_op(), which now return -ETIMEDOUT through vf610_nfc_cmd():
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c:vf610_nfc_correct_data() {
...
nfc->data_access = true;
ret = nand_read_page_op(&nfc->chip, page, 0, dat, mtd->writesize);
if (!ret)
ret = nand_read_oob_op(&nfc->chip, page, 0, oob,
vf610_nfc_spare_size(mtd));
nfc->data_access = false;
if (ret)
return ret;
...
}
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c:vf610_nfc_read_page() {
...
stat = vf610_nfc_correct_data(chip, buf, chip->oob_poi, page);
if (stat < 0) {
mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
return 0;
} else {
...
}
Because vf610_nfc_read_page() treats any negative stat as an uncorrectable
ECC failure, a timeout in vf610_nfc_correct_data() increments
mtd->ecc_stats.failed and returns 0, leaving the bogus ECC-corrected SRAM
data in buf and reporting -EBADMSG to the caller instead of aborting with
-ETIMEDOUT. Only stat == -EBADMSG should be counted as an ECC failure,
while other negative errors should be returned directly.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261114192031.959376-1-mehmet.fide@gmail.com?part=3
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-14 19:20 [PATCH v2 0/3] mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: fix the OOB of written pages and command timeouts Mehmet Fide
2026-11-14 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: write the OOB bytes on page writes Mehmet Fide
2026-11-14 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: keep a timed-out command from completing the next one Mehmet Fide
2026-11-14 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: return an error when a command times out Mehmet Fide
2026-11-14 19:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-14 20:10 ` Mehmet Fide
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-214971@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexey.klimov@linaro.org \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mehmet.fide@gmail.com \
--cc=mehmet.fide@screeningeagle.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).