public inbox for linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* remap_pfn_range() and mapping RAM
@ 2009-05-10 16:46 Michal Nazarewicz
  2009-05-11 17:40 ` Suresh Siddha
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michal Nazarewicz @ 2009-05-10 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-newbie; +Cc: Suresh Siddha

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1504 bytes --]

Hello everyone,

While developing a method for mapping RAM memory into user space
I stumbled across Suresh Siddha's commit that "broke" my code:

  commit be03d9e8022030c16abf534e33e185bfc3d40eef
  x86, pat: fix warn_on_once() while mapping 0-1MB range with /dev/mem

I believe there were important reasons for the changes but how do I map
user RAM memory into user space?  Up to this point I've used something
along the lines of (error checking removed):

#v+
static int file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
	const size_t start  = /* physical address of memory allocated
	                         using alloc_bootmem_low_pages() */;

	return remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start,
	                       (start >> PAGE_SHIFT) + vma->vm_pgoff
	                       vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start,
	                       vma->vm_page_prot);
}
#v-

Reverting the be03... commit makes it work again but I guess it's not
a good way to solve this problem.

Could anyone point me to proper function which may be used like
remap_pfn_range() but work on RAM addresses?  It is important, that the
function will work in similar fashion, ie. create raw PFN mappings
without associated struct page.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
 .o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
 ..o | Computer Science,  Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz   (o o)
 ooo +--<mina86*tlen.pl>--<jid:mina86*jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: remap_pfn_range() and mapping RAM
  2009-05-10 16:46 remap_pfn_range() and mapping RAM Michal Nazarewicz
@ 2009-05-11 17:40 ` Suresh Siddha
  2009-05-12 18:56   ` Michal Nazarewicz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Suresh Siddha @ 2009-05-11 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michal Nazarewicz
  Cc: linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org, "; venkatesh.pallipadi"

On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 09:46 -0700, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> While developing a method for mapping RAM memory into user space
> I stumbled across Suresh Siddha's commit that "broke" my code:
> 
>   commit be03d9e8022030c16abf534e33e185bfc3d40eef
>   x86, pat: fix warn_on_once() while mapping 0-1MB range with /dev/mem
> 
> I believe there were important reasons for the changes but how do I map
> user RAM memory into user space?  Up to this point I've used something
> along the lines of (error checking removed):
> 
> #v+
> static int file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> 	const size_t start  = /* physical address of memory allocated
> 	                         using alloc_bootmem_low_pages() */;
> 
> 	return remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start,
> 	                       (start >> PAGE_SHIFT) + vma->vm_pgoff
> 	                       vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start,
> 	                       vma->vm_page_prot);
> }
> #v-
> 
> Reverting the be03... commit makes it work again but I guess it's not
> a good way to solve this problem.
> 
> Could anyone point me to proper function which may be used like
> remap_pfn_range() but work on RAM addresses?  It is important, that the
> function will work in similar fashion, ie. create raw PFN mappings
> without associated struct page.

Are you using 2.6.29?

This mainline commit:

commit 4bb9c5c02153dfc89a6c73a6f32091413805ad7d
Author: Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date:   Thu Mar 12 17:45:27 2009 -0700

has fixed this issue with this portion of the patch:

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
index e0ab173..21bc1f7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
@@ -641,10 +641,11 @@ static int reserve_pfn_range(u64 paddr, unsigned
long size
        is_ram = pat_pagerange_is_ram(paddr, paddr + size);
 
        /*
-        * reserve_pfn_range() doesn't support RAM pages.
+        * reserve_pfn_range() doesn't support RAM pages. Maintain the
current
+        * behavior with RAM pages by returning success.
         */
        if (is_ram != 0)
-               return -EINVAL;
+               return 0;
 
        ret = reserve_memtype(paddr, paddr + size, want_flags, &flags);
        if (ret)

thanks
suresh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: remap_pfn_range() and mapping RAM
  2009-05-11 17:40 ` Suresh Siddha
@ 2009-05-12 18:56   ` Michal Nazarewicz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michal Nazarewicz @ 2009-05-12 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: suresh.b.siddha; +Cc: linux-newbie, venkatesh.pallipadi

> On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 09:46 -0700, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> While developing a method for mapping RAM memory into user space
>> I stumbled across Suresh Siddha's commit that "broke" my code:
>> 
>>   commit be03d9e8022030c16abf534e33e185bfc3d40eef
>>   x86, pat: fix warn_on_once() while mapping 0-1MB range with /dev/mem
>> 
>> I've used something along the lines of (error checking removed):
>> 
>> #v+
>> 	return remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start,
>> 	                       (start >> PAGE_SHIFT) + vma->vm_pgoff
>> 	                       vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start,
>> 	                       vma->vm_page_prot);
>> #v-
>> 
>> Reverting the be03... commit makes it work again but I guess it's not
>> a good way to solve this problem.

Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> writes:
> This mainline commit:
>
> commit 4bb9c5c02153dfc89a6c73a6f32091413805ad7d
> Author: Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> Date:   Thu Mar 12 17:45:27 2009 -0700
>
> has fixed this issue with this portion of the patch:

Ah, thanks, it works great now!  And sorry for the bother (I should've
checked with 2.6.29.2 at least).

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
 .o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
 ..o | Computer Science,  Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz   (o o)
 ooo +--<mina86*tlen.pl>--<jid:mina86*jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-12 18:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-10 16:46 remap_pfn_range() and mapping RAM Michal Nazarewicz
2009-05-11 17:40 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-05-12 18:56   ` Michal Nazarewicz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox