From: Ankit Jain <ankitjain1580@yahoo.com>
To: newbie <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Fwd: Re: clock cycles
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:12:06 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041013131206.67214.qmail@web52902.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 254 bytes --]
Note: forwarded message attached.
________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2030 bytes --]
From: Ankit Jain <ankitjain1580@yahoo.com>
To: Jim Nelson <james4765@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: clock cycles
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:10:50 +0100 (BST)
First of all Thanks a lot for help
see inline
--- Jim Nelson <james4765@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> Not exactly. The processor speed is an indication
> of how fast it can
> carry out instructions, but on CISC (complex
> instruction set computing)
> computers (x86, x86-64) some instructions take more
> than one clock cycle
> to complete. Intel has pushed the clock speed (as
> much for marketing as
> for any other reason - AMD produces processors that
> can do comparable
> work at a lower clock speed)
Sorry could not understand this. What is making AMD
processors work faster than Intel processors at a
lower clock cycle. also i want to know how to prove
this that AMD 64 bit processors will work faster than
Intel 32 bit processor even if they have clock cycles
like 3.6 GHz....
>just about as far as it
> can go - they are
> having severe problems with manufaturing the 3.6 GHz
> chips.
> It is only an accurate speed comparison between
> chips in the same
> processor family - the last of the Pentium 3 chips
> were actually faster
> than the higher-clocked early Pentium 4 releases -
> and it's been that
Hows that? /is it due to higher clock cycles in P3 and
less no. of transistor in early P4?
Well definately PowerPC's are faster than Intel. i do
agree. Some what i feel a day will come when CISC
processors will find difficult to servive...
Thanks again
ANkit Jain
________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-13 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-13 13:12 Ankit Jain [this message]
2004-10-13 18:59 ` Fwd: Re: clock cycles chuck gelm
2004-10-13 20:55 ` Jim Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041013131206.67214.qmail@web52902.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=ankitjain1580@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox