From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: chuck gelm Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: clock cycles Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:59:34 -0400 Sender: linux-newbie-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <416D7B16.4040809@gelm.net> References: <20041013131206.67214.qmail@web52902.mail.yahoo.com> Reply-To: chuck@gelm.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20041013131206.67214.qmail@web52902.mail.yahoo.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Ankit Jain Cc: newbie > Sorry could not understand this. <1> What is making AMD > processors work faster than Intel processors at a > lower clock cycle. <2> also i want to know how to prove > this that AMD 64 bit processors will work faster than > Intel 32 bit processor even if they have clock cycles > like 3.6 GHz.... <1> An AMD processor may execute a command with less clock cycles than an Intel processor. e.g. It could get more work done with equal clock cycles. It could get as much work done with less clock cycles. It could get more work done with less clock speed. <2> Why not let someone else prove it and then you can simply accept their education, skill, and knowledge. There is more to measuring CPU than clock cycle speed. How fast does it r/w memory and devices...internal and external cache, bus speed, ...? Regards, Chuck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs