From: lindax newbie <linux-newbie@tlinx.org>
To: Ankit Jain <ankitjain1580@yahoo.com>
Cc: newbie <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Frame pointer Vs Stack Pointer
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:10:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41A63C4D.804@tlinx.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041123092440.27562.qmail@web52908.mail.yahoo.com>
Frame pointer is a convenience for referencing local variables in a
subrouting, usually all the args are pushed onto the stack then BP
(the frame, or Base pointer) is pushed , then SP
(the stack pointer) is copied to BP, so all variables can easily be
referenced via BP+x, BP+y, etc. It is especially useful if you are
debugging since BP will give you an idea of where the parameters to
the current subroutine are located. It is also useful if you are doing
a stack traceback since the values of BP have been pushed onto the stack
for each stack frame.
On the otherhand, there are otherways of accessing those variables by
referencing off of "SP" and using BP as a general purpose register
to do other things -- this can result in faster code that is less
easy to debug.
If you aren't doing kernel debugging and/or are not expecting to be
generating stack traces, allowing the compiler to use BP (Base/Frame
Pointer) is usually a good thing for optimizing memory and CPU
execution time.
-linda
Ankit Jain wrote:
>Frame pointer, Stack Pointer....i want to understand
>this concept w.r.t stack in a program
>
>how a program stores and understand by this
>
>thanks
>
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-25 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-23 9:24 Frame pointer Vs Stack Pointer Ankit Jain
2004-11-23 10:22 ` Jagadeesh Bhaskar P
2004-11-25 20:10 ` lindax newbie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41A63C4D.804@tlinx.org \
--to=linux-newbie@tlinx.org \
--cc=ankitjain1580@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox