From: Ray Olszewski <ray@comarre.com>
To: linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Netconfig Fail
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:33:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4344D330.2050005@comarre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051006091512.7dd839e8.heisspf@skyinet.net>
Peter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Slackware 10.1 kernel 2.4.29
>
> My onboard LAN card on the mobo failed and I had to switch to an external LAN card.
>
> I disabled in BIOS Ethernet onboard. Then I did netconfig. Slackware found the LAN card I entered all necessary data and the configuration went w/o any errors.
Just to be clear ... the relevant kernel module does identify the card
and create the eth0 interface. Right? (One way to check: use "ifconfig
-a", which will list *all* interfaces, while "ifconfig" by itself only
lists *configured* interfaces.)
At this point, I'm still uncertain as to whether the kernel module is
failing to find the NIC, or the NIC is failing to get an IP address.
> However, I cannot connect to the Internet. On booting after the MAC address was found it should produce the the IP address which it does not. It just sits for a while then continues booting. The same happens when I do /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1.
"produce"? Do you mean you get an IP address via DHCP? Via PPPoE? (These
days, home broadband connections rarely come with static IP addresses,
so I surmise you don't have one of those rarities.)
In any case, troubleshooting is easier if we know how it is *supposed*
to work.
> Ifconfig naturally shows no connection just the loop-back.
See above.
> Where is the hitch?
Round up the usual suspects ...
What kernel module is involved?
What happens if you modprobe it from the command line?
Does lsmod show it as loaded?
What happens if you "ifup eth0" from the command line?
> I had no problem in Fedora4 to configure the new Lan card and in the gem Damned Small Linux distro, where I am now, the new LAN card was found w/o me doing anything.
This is all good, since it means that the card should work, and we just
need to spot the detail where you have (or Slackware has) something
wrong. It also should eliminate the possibility of MAC-address
authentication causing a problem.
Is there any possibility of a mechanical problem (a bad cable, say)?
That is, aside from the distro change, was *everything* else *exactly*
the same in your Slackware failure as in your Fedora and DSL successes?
I'm assuming that you ran both other distros on the same system (same
mobo), not with (say) the same NIC in a different mobo ... but please
correct me if I've assumed too much here.
What are the details behind your writing above that "I entered all
necessary data"? Since (apparently) you did not have to enter anything
in the DSL test, and maybe not in the Fedora test either, this would at
least appear to be a possible source of differences.
> Help for slackware appreciated.
>
> Thanks & regards
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-06 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-06 13:15 Netconfig Fail Peter
2005-10-06 7:33 ` Ray Olszewski [this message]
2005-10-07 16:23 ` Peter
2005-10-07 5:49 ` Ray Olszewski
2005-10-07 11:20 ` chuck gelm
2005-10-07 17:23 ` Ray Olszewski
2005-10-08 15:43 ` Peter
2005-10-08 15:22 ` Peter
2005-10-07 11:36 ` chuck gelm
2005-10-08 15:39 ` Peter
2005-10-08 4:18 ` Ray Olszewski
[not found] ` <200510052204.15272.david@fierbaugh.org>
2005-10-06 14:54 ` Peter
2005-10-06 12:53 ` David Fierbaugh
2005-10-06 18:52 ` chuck gelm
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-08 18:33 Peter
2005-10-08 16:01 ` Ray Olszewski
2005-10-09 1:33 ` Peter
2005-10-09 7:04 ` Peter
2005-10-09 15:29 ` Peter
2005-10-09 18:00 ` chuck gelm
2005-10-09 7:08 Peter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4344D330.2050005@comarre.com \
--to=ray@comarre.com \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox