From: 益牙 <simonyanix@gmail.com>
To: Siddu <siddu.sjce@gmail.com>
Cc: Rick Brown <rick.brown.3@gmail.com>,
kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>,
linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 32 bit processors / 64 bit processors
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:02:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49FAB6BD-25CD-484D-AC5D-4731D083E075@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b0a5b990910202239u7423e88du4786700f79a4bda9@mail.gmail.com>
On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Siddu wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Rick Brown <rick.brown.3@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firstly, I'm trying to understand what exactly characterizes a
> procesor or an operating system as 32bit / 64 bit. I've read that it
> means the "native word size" of a machine. But what exactly is that?
> Register size? Address bus size? Anything else?
>
>
> When they say its 32/64 bit machine its the capability of the system
> or processor to process so many bits at once !
I had an understanding of this being how many bits you have to address
your RAM.
>
>
> Secondly, I'm trying to understand what exactly does a sizeof(int)
> depend on when we say it is "platform specific". Is it dependent of
> compiler being 32bit / 64 bit? Or the OS being 32bit / 64 bit? Or the
> processor being 32 / 64 bit?
>
> its dependent on processor being 32/64 bit
Just did a comparison test but it tells me otherwise. But I'm not sure
if the test case if correct, can someone improve it?
On a 64bit CentOS:
[root@yyan ~]# more test.c
#include <stdio.h>
int main ()
{
printf ("%d\n", sizeof(int));
return 0;
}
[root@yyan ~]# gcc test.c
[root@yyan ~]# ./a.out
4
[root@yyan ~]# uname -a
Linux yyan.pmlab.com 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 10:41:14 EST
2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@yyan ~]#
On my Leopard: (Hopefully it's a 32bit OS as it shows)
simonmac:coding yansimon$ cat test.c
#include <stdio.h>
int main ()
{
printf ("%d\n", sizeof(int));
return 0;
}
simonmac:coding yansimon$ gcc test.c
simonmac:coding yansimon$ ./a.out
4
simonmac:coding yansimon$ uname -a
Darwin simonmac.local 9.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.8.0: Wed Jul 15
16:55:01 PDT 2009; root:xnu-1228.15.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
simonmac:coding yansimon$
>
> Lastly, How are "sizes" of compiler / OS / processor inter related?
> Here is my understanding. A 32 bit processor can only be running a 32
> bit OS.
>
> No ... 32 bit OS can run anything <= 32 bit
>
> A 64 bit processor may run a 32 or a 64 bit OS.
>
> yes thats right !
>
> A 32 bit
> compiler genrates code only to be run on a 32 bit OS; ditto for 64
> bit.
>
> Not sure about this let others have their say !
> Is this right?
>
>
> Please correct me if i am wrong !
> TIA,
>
> Rick
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
> "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@nl.linux.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> ~Sid~
> I have never met a man so ignorant that i couldn't learn something
> from him
>
--
益牙
http://www.google.com/profiles/simonyanix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-21 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-21 3:02 32 bit processors / 64 bit processors Rick Brown
2009-10-21 5:39 ` Siddu
2009-10-21 6:02 ` 益牙 [this message]
2009-10-21 6:36 ` Ryan Moore
2009-10-21 6:52 ` C
2009-10-23 5:05 ` Rajat Jain
2009-10-23 5:20 ` C
2009-10-23 6:23 ` Rajat Jain
2009-10-23 6:58 ` C
[not found] ` <eaf9549291394c8b53f26fba12024a86@virginbroadband.com.au>
[not found] ` <b14bc42a0911060423g324caedw3992061796125ea@mail.gmail.com>
2009-11-07 4:41 ` vkm
2009-11-07 10:10 ` hmthalib
2009-11-07 10:30 ` vkm
2009-11-07 10:49 ` hmthalib
2009-11-09 18:27 ` Pulkit Goel
2009-11-10 2:09 ` Microbit_P43000
2009-10-21 7:43 ` askb
2009-11-07 10:20 ` hmthalib
2009-11-13 3:37 ` Drew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49FAB6BD-25CD-484D-AC5D-4731D083E075@gmail.com \
--to=simonyanix@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.brown.3@gmail.com \
--cc=siddu.sjce@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox