From: Ray Olszewski <ray@comarre.com>
To: linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Networking problem...please help..
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 07:06:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20030716065640.01fadea8@celine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030716122034.88944.qmail@web21001.mail.yahoo.com>
At 05:20 AM 7/16/2003 -0700, Sanjay Arora wrote:
>Netmask is 255.255.255.0 on all machines.
>
>Point is that the WinXP machine is being given a
>redirect by the Linux firewall and that is being
>ignored, either due to inability of WinXP or some
>misconfiguration by me.
[old stuff deleted]
As I said in my prior response, redirects are commonly (though not always)
ignored. Redirects are a way of spoofing, thus a security hole (even though
they also have legitimate uses, as in your case). That XP rejects redirect
instructions is quite reasonable.
(Are you sure that your Linux client on the LAN is receiving and acting on
the router's redirect message? You haven't said. In any case, if it is on
network 192.169.250.0/24, and has default gateway 192.168.200.1, as your
earlier message seemed to say, it has a more elaborate routing table than
the WinXP host ... either a route to 192.168.200.0/24 or a static route to
192.168.200.1/32.)
In any case, if this is the "point" of your query, is it not better made on
a Windows XP list than a pair of Linux lists? (BTW, no one else has
mentioned this, but cross-posting of this sort is usually considered
discourteous.) Both Linux hosts on the LAN seem to be functioning correctly
(at least as far as I can tell from your description).
The only solution I can suggest is not to use the redirect trick to enable
connectivity. Instead, give the WinXP host a proper routing table that
tells it that it has a direct route to network 192.168.250.0/24.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-16 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3F1332FC.8080903@bcgreen.com>
2003-07-16 12:20 ` Linux Networking problem...please help Sanjay Arora
2003-07-16 14:06 ` Ray Olszewski [this message]
2003-07-16 15:00 ` Sven Schuster
2003-07-16 15:16 ` Sven Schuster
2003-07-17 15:09 ` Liam Helmer
2003-07-16 17:45 beolach
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-13 18:41 Sanjay Arora
2003-07-13 21:52 ` Ray Olszewski
2003-07-14 2:41 ` Glynn Clements
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5.1.0.14.1.20030716065640.01fadea8@celine \
--to=ray@comarre.com \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox