From: Ray Olszewski <ray@comarre.com>
To: linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: About PID...???!!!
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:58:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20030910084359.01f35750@celine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001601c377af$2fedc680$ccc252c6@hume>
At 11:21 AM 9/10/2003 -0400, John T. Williams wrote:
>They are assigned linearly, however once a pid is used, it is never reused
>until the machine reboots.
This is not quite correct. The pid assignment process wraps, I *think* at
32767 (or maybe 65535). Next time around, the kernel skips over any pids
that are still in use from the last round of assignment.
>A pid of 413 means that when that process was fork()'ed there had been 412
>other processes already created. But remember every time you type ls, you've
>run a process.
>
>413 isn't a large pid at all. My linux box which I very rarely reboot is at
>PIDs that start at 20000
>
>I'm surprised that any program you start after the boot process is as low as
>412.
Whether that is surprising or not depends on what he uses the host for and,
naturally, on how recently it was rebooted. While my workstation is way up
there (30180), my Linux-based router, which does not start new processes
very much, is only at pid 828.
And, of course, there are persistent processes on any Linux host that go
back to the boot/init process ... starting with init itself (always pid 1)
and including long-lived daemons such as syslogd, klogd, and portmap;
pseudo processes that are actually run in the kernel (mostly [k*] process
names); and getty proceses listening on VTs that never get logins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-10 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-10 14:23 About PID...???!!! Silambu Chelvan
2003-09-10 15:21 ` John T. Williams
2003-09-10 15:58 ` Ray Olszewski [this message]
2003-09-10 18:03 ` John T. Williams
2003-09-10 18:04 ` John T. Williams
2003-09-10 18:56 ` Ray Olszewski
2003-09-10 19:15 ` John T. Williams
2003-09-10 19:17 ` John T. Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5.1.0.14.1.20030910084359.01f35750@celine \
--to=ray@comarre.com \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox