From: James Miller <jamtat@mailsnare.net>
To: linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2 ethernet jacks -> single net connection?
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:09:32 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401071143110.3379@localhost> (raw)
I've got 2 physical ethernet jacks available to me here. I assume each
processes traffic independently: I've been online at both simultaneoulsy
with 2 different computers, anyway. Since I'll be setting up a
firewall/router here (LRP type thing, with an older computer), I was just
wondering about the possibilities of combining the two into a single
internet connection (should make the connection faster, according to my
understanding). The way I could see this happening physically is that
each jack has a cable going to a NIC in the router/firewall, which in turn
has a NIC that leads to a hub/switch (3 NIC's in the router/firewall).
The router/firewall NATs to/from the two jacks to/from the local network.
Somehow I recall the term "channel bonding" relative to this, though I
don't know if that's really what I'm trying to do. First, I'd just like
to ask if, in principle, what I'm thinking about doing is possible (for
me-bearing in mind that I can likely get the assistance of a certain 3rd
tier Linux-guru-in-training mentioned in an earlier post)? If so, my next
question is: in broad terms, how? It would be nice if one of the
router/firewall distros can more or less automate this setup for me/us.
Input appreciated.
Thanks, James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 18:09 James Miller [this message]
2004-01-08 4:58 ` 2 ethernet jacks -> single net connection? Beolach
2004-01-08 17:13 ` James Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-09 0:15 Juan Facundo Suárez
2004-01-09 5:39 ` Beolach
2004-01-19 9:45 ` Juan Facundo Suárez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0401071143110.3379@localhost \
--to=jamtat@mailsnare.net \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox