public inbox for linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Miller <jamtat@mailsnare.net>
To: linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
Subject: net (& module, I guess) problems after dist-upgrade
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:36:43 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406121719540.1071@debian-emach> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406121445360.1825@debian-emach>

Well, I took your advice and dist-upgraded Ray.  Now I know why I was not
very anxious to do it :).  A problem occured with kernel modules during
the dist-upgrade.  From memory, it was something like the new modules
couldn't be configured until after the system was rebooted: somehow the
fact that the running kernel was using modules was going to interfere.
The message made it sound like this generation was going to be done
automatically on next boot (and it was pretty stern about warning me to
reboot).  I took that advice: however, also in the wake of the
dist-upgrade there was a lilo problem.  I've got sort of a complex boot
menu, and decided I'd need to get in there and hand-edit it.  I did.
But, as fate would have it, I made a minor goof-up and couldn't fully boot
when I sent the system down (the initrd.img symlink wasn't pointing to the
right initrd.img).  But I did manage to reboot with the old kernel after
the new one rebooting failed and to straighten out that mistake.  It was
at that point that I spotted the fearful message "eth0 ERROR while getting
interface flags: no such device."  And, sure enough, there was no net
connection.  And there was no process automatically running to straighten
out whatever module problem had occured in the dist-upgrade.  Tried
booting a yet older kernel, but with the same eth0 error.  Thinking maybe
the card had gone south, I booted Knoppix (can someone send that guy a
purple heart or something?).  eth0 came up fine under Knoppix.  I ran
lsmod there to see what modules my NIC is using.  Booted back to the
dist-upgraded Debian, modprobed those modules and ran ifup -a - and here I
am on the 'net again.  But this is obviously not the real solution to the
problem.  This has all been a long-winded preface to the question: what
the heck I gotta do to get my NIC modules back to loading on boot? Am I
gonna run into other module problems as well?  What's the way to start
this process that gets the module loading routine working as it should be?
I think there was a reference to modules.dep or maybe modules.conf in that
message I saw during dist-upgrade.  But there was definitely nothing there
telling me how I could manually start the process that couldn't finish
during dist-upgrade.  Any pointers, please?

Thanks, James

PS Most of the above refers to having booted using the new kernel (2.6.6,
though some of those boots were with the old 2.6.5 kernel and one was even
with the 2.4.22 kernel).  None of those were able to use eth0 and gave the
same error message during the boot process.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-12 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-11 21:01 Debian Sid startup problems James Miller
2004-06-11 23:15 ` Ray Olszewski
2004-06-12  1:05   ` James Miller
2004-06-12  1:55     ` Ray Olszewski
2004-06-12  2:21       ` James Miller
2004-06-12  3:12         ` James Miller
2004-06-12  4:36           ` James Miller
2004-06-12  5:08             ` Ray Olszewski
2004-06-12 16:20               ` James Miller
2004-06-12 18:04                 ` chuck gelm
2004-06-12 18:10                   ` James Miller
2004-06-12 18:47                     ` James Miller
2004-06-12 18:32                 ` Ray Olszewski
2004-06-12 19:04                   ` James Miller
2004-06-12 19:27                     ` Ray Olszewski
2004-06-12 19:50                       ` James Miller
2004-06-12 22:36                         ` James Miller [this message]
2004-06-13  3:57                           ` net (& module, I guess) problems after dist-upgrade Ray Olszewski
2004-06-14 15:01                             ` James Miller
2004-06-14 16:35                               ` Ray Olszewski
2004-06-14 17:33                                 ` James Miller
2004-06-14 18:06                                   ` James Miller
2004-06-14 18:50                                     ` Ray Olszewski
2004-06-14 19:13                                       ` James Miller
2004-06-14 22:44                                         ` James Miller
2004-06-14 19:25                                       ` pa3gcu
2004-06-13  4:43                           ` joy
2004-06-12  1:36   ` Debian Sid startup problems James Miller
2004-06-12  2:07     ` Ray Olszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0406121719540.1071@debian-emach \
    --to=jamtat@mailsnare.net \
    --cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox