From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: after effects of a kernel API change Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:47:42 -0700 Message-ID: References: <292693080701172015n736a269fl6945ba4fe19d8174@mail.gmail.com> <20070118051026.GA29695@Ahmed> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Rajat Jain's message of "Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:05:53 +0530") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Rajat Jain Cc: "Ahmed S. Darwish" , Daniel Rodrick , kernelnewbies , Linux Newbie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Rajat Jain" writes: >> > >> > Is there any way volunteers like me can help in this exercise? >> >> See the /APIchanges in the Kernel Janitors TODO list >> http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelJanitors/Todo >> > > Hi, > > This is regarding the link posted above. > > 1) How do I make sure if some one is NOT working on any of the > mentioned bullet points? Who coordinates? On what mailing list? Depends on the issue. Release early and release often and there won't be much duplicate work :) > 2) Do any patches for the above Todo list have the chances of getting > merged into the mainstream kernel? Who approves? I suppose the > respective maintainer of the driver / subsystem getting affected? Generally. Occasionally for small things other paths are available. Eric