RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the tree

[Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>]

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> Hi Kukjin,
> 
Hi Stephen,

> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c between commit 46bfc99c9225 ("ARM: l2c:
> exynos: convert to generic l2c OF initialisation (and thereby fix it)")
> from the arm tree and commit 3919fb954b3a ("ARM: EXYNOS: Remove
> exynos_subsys registration") from the samsung tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
> 
Looks good to me, thanks.

- Kukjin

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index afce154f83f9,93507ee98c86..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> @@@ -241,17 -246,22 +243,6 @@@ void __init exynos_init_io(void
>   	exynos_map_io();
>   }
> 
> - struct bus_type exynos_subsys = {
> - 	.name		= "exynos-core",
> - 	.dev_name	= "exynos-core",
> - };
> -
> - static int __init exynos_core_init(void)
>  -static int __init exynos4_l2x0_cache_init(void)
> --{
> - 	return subsys_system_register(&exynos_subsys, NULL);
>  -	int ret;
>  -
>  -	ret = l2x0_of_init(L2_AUX_VAL, L2_AUX_MASK);
>  -	if (ret)
>  -		return ret;
>  -
>  -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_S5P_SLEEP)) {
>  -		l2x0_regs_phys = virt_to_phys(&l2x0_saved_regs);
>  -		clean_dcache_area(&l2x0_regs_phys, sizeof(unsigned long));
>  -	}
>  -	return 0;
> --}
> - core_initcall(exynos_core_init);
>  -early_initcall(exynos4_l2x0_cache_init);
> --
>   static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
>   {
>   	struct device_node *i2c_np;