From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
jlayton@kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC netfs] Fix uninitialized variable in netfs_retry_read_subrequests()
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:07:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03561ca5-df13-4b6c-8ac8-2dfe45ec2b6d@paulmck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4059210.1734654011@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 12:20:11AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > This should actually be considered more of a bug report than a patch.
> >
> > Clang 18.1.8 (but not GCC 11.5.0) complains that the "subreq" local
> > variable can be used uninitialized in netfs_retry_read_subrequests(),
> > just after the abandon_after label. This function is unusual in having
> > three instances of this local variable. The third and last one is clearly
> > erroneous because there is a branch out of the enclosing do-while loop
> > to the end of this function, and it looks like the intent is that the
> > code at the end of this function be using the same value of the "subreq"
> > local variable as is used within that do-while loop.
> >
> > Therefore, take the obvious (if potentially quite misguided) approach
> > of removing the third declaration of "subreq", instead simply setting
> > it to NULL.
>
> I think you're looking at the old version of my netfs-writeback branch that's
> residing in Christian's vfs.netfs branch. I've posted a new version of my
> branch[1] without this problem and am hoping for Christian to update the
> branch[2] so that Stephen can pull it into linux-next.
Me too, and thank you for looking into this!
Thanx, Paul
> David
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20241216204124.3752367-1-dhowells@redhat.com/T/#t
>
> [2] And hoping he'll remember to drop "[PATCH v5 26/32] Display waited-on page
> index after 1min of waiting" for me. I forgot to remove that debugging patch.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-20 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 18:43 [PATCH RFC netfs] Fix uninitialized variable in netfs_retry_read_subrequests() Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-20 0:20 ` David Howells
2024-12-20 1:07 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=03561ca5-df13-4b6c-8ac8-2dfe45ec2b6d@paulmck-laptop \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox