From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: Kernel OOPS followed by a panic on next20190507 with 4K page size Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 07:00:31 +0530 Message-ID: <0414d06e-1c4e-e9ec-e265-fd9662308df8@linux.ibm.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" To: Sachin Sant , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 5/8/19 4:30 PM, Sachin Sant wrote: > While running LTP tests (specifically futex_wake04) against next-20199597 > build with 4K page size on a POWER8 LPAR following crash is observed. > > [ 4233.214876] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0x0000001c > [ 4233.214898] Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000001d1e58c > [ 4233.214905] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] > [ 4233.214911] LE PAGE_SIZE=4K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries > [ 4233.214920] Dumping ftrace buffer: > [ 4233.214928] (ftrace buffer empty) > [ 4233.214933] Modules linked in: overlay rpadlpar_io rpaphp iptable_mangle xt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_tcpudp tun bridge stp llc kvm iptable_filter pseries_rng rng_core vmx_crypto ip_tables x_tables autofs4 [last unloaded: dummy_del_mod] > [ 4233.214973] CPU: 3 PID: 4635 Comm: futex_wake04 Tainted: G W O 5.1.0-next-20190507-autotest #1 > [ 4233.214980] NIP: c000000001d1e58c LR: c000000001d1e54c CTR: 0000000000000000 > [ 4233.214987] REGS: c000000004937890 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: G W O (5.1.0-next-20190507-autotest) > [ 4233.214993] MSR: 8000000000009033 CR: 22424822 XER: 00000000 > [ 4233.215005] CFAR: c00000000183e9e0 DAR: 000000000000001c DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 0 > [ 4233.215005] GPR00: c000000001901a80 c000000004937b20 c000000003938700 0000000000000000 > [ 4233.215005] GPR04: 0000000000400cc0 000000000003efff 000000027966e000 c000000003ba8700 > [ 4233.215005] GPR08: c000000003ba8700 000000000d601125 c000000003ba8700 0000000080000000 > [ 4233.215005] GPR12: 0000000022424822 c00000001ecae280 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > [ 4233.215005] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > [ 4233.215005] GPR20: 0000000000000018 c0000000039e2d30 c0000000039e2d28 c0000002762da460 > [ 4233.215005] GPR24: 000000000000001c 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 c000000001901a80 > [ 4233.215005] GPR28: 0000000000400cc0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000400cc0 > [ 4233.215065] NIP [c000000001d1e58c] kmem_cache_alloc+0xbc/0x5a0 > [ 4233.215071] LR [c000000001d1e54c] kmem_cache_alloc+0x7c/0x5a0 > [ 4233.215075] Call Trace: > [ 4233.215081] [c000000004937b20] [c000000001c91150] __pud_alloc+0x160/0x200 (unreliable) > [ 4233.215090] [c000000004937b80] [c000000001901a80] huge_pte_alloc+0x580/0x950 > [ 4233.215098] [c000000004937c00] [c000000001cf7910] hugetlb_fault+0x9a0/0x1250 > [ 4233.215106] [c000000004937ce0] [c000000001c94a80] handle_mm_fault+0x490/0x4a0 > [ 4233.215114] [c000000004937d20] [c0000000018d529c] __do_page_fault+0x77c/0x1f00 > [ 4233.215121] [c000000004937e00] [c0000000018d6a48] do_page_fault+0x28/0x50 > [ 4233.215129] [c000000004937e20] [c00000000183b0d4] handle_page_fault+0x18/0x38 > [ 4233.215135] Instruction dump: > [ 4233.215139] 39290001 f92ac1b0 419e009c 3ce20027 3ba00000 e927c1f0 39290001 f927c1f0 > [ 4233.215149] 3d420027 e92ac290 39290001 f92ac290 <8359001c> 83390018 60000000 3ce20027 I did send a patch to the list to handle page allocation failures in this patch. But i guess what we are finding here is get_current() crashing. Any chance to bisect this? -aneesh