From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lihao Liang Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:29:03 +0800 Message-ID: <10748b8a-a3a4-c4c0-b476-3afd4e0e4499@huawei.com> References: <20171129115151.40b72764@canb.auug.org.au> <20171129011429.GB3624@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0d3da4c4-1eb3-bcdc-690b-7f864ab35073@huawei.com> <5A1E261A.30302@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5A1E261A.30302@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hanjun Guo , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , lihao.liang@gmail.com List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 2017/11/29 11:14, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi Lihao, > > On 2017/11/29 10:48, Lihao Liang wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> Signed-off-by: Lihao Liang > > ... > >> >> Many thanks, >> Lihao. >> >> On 2017/11/29 9:14, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:51:51AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> Hi Paul, >>>> >>>> Commit >>>> >>>> d7e182c9c324 ("rcu: Remove unnecessary spinlock in rcu_boot_init_percpu_data()") >>>> >>>> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. >>> Good catch, Stephen! >>> >>> Lihao, would you please get me you Signed-off-by? The patch is below. >>> >>> Thanx, Paul >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> commit d7e182c9c32480c1f579dd888ac50e88bfb39596 >>> Author: Liang Lihao > > So it's better to keep the author and Signed-off-by the same :) > Sure. Paul and Stephen, please use Signed-off-by: Lihao Liang Many thanks, Lihao. > Thanks > Hanjun > > > . >