From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: linux-next: tip tree build warning Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:20:54 +0200 Message-ID: <10f740e80909131320j1b4f6552qf809fbf5049375d3@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090911185600.9641f38b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-px0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:54931 "EHLO mail-px0-f189.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751805AbZIMUUu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:20:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090911185600.9641f38b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:56, Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig) produced this warning: > > kernel/sched.c:122: warning: 'double_rq_lock' declared 'static' but n= ever defined > > Introduced by commit 18a3885fc1ffa92c2212ff0afdf033403d5b0fa0 ("sched= : > Remove reciprocal for cpu_power"). =C2=A0This is a build with CONFIG_= SMP > undefined. Yep. same here. It's even more fishy: - double_rq_lock() is useded inside #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT - double_rq_lock() is defined inside #ifdef CONFIG_SMP - double_rq_lock() is used inside #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-= m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker= =2E But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something li= ke that. -- Linus Torvalds