From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3E7035CBC6; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762950682; cv=none; b=YyDwhryScoBNJA1GQFyGQm07IhhrfLNPDTe0djXwso6y9bUCJd3EjfH1GieGVIHu90O4Ec3ijXeMa8V4stgWggBU8t4U/d3GtGwNDNPyztIt0s9vKGr2Fk4W5bFrtwN5GZ7nYsYadJdZz8gnbkdLRCtL7FY3baApeWI9Jr5TlQE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762950682; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BlE5g+SiMSq6fj99+C5fH+eZFaLaTysnZRh+Dln4QhY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=OQf6cxYF9nuwouVGTkzpUq/0dMQ0hWaUeL+P94dD8BmfNKcB8lXi//FTFlYHKvBKto6BzLdS2psWh0emvQimpVij8bIhDiiepU1ugT4S3jO+XOUWzJoOqUDj/3pcMXJKLswXPkuBVGaQJp7wXfKYDlt34VWOKB1Sp7OJOtncpIk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=HNBkTfOS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="HNBkTfOS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1762950680; x=1794486680; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BlE5g+SiMSq6fj99+C5fH+eZFaLaTysnZRh+Dln4QhY=; b=HNBkTfOScyG0GE/hCvBw1W66hprFUFiHKm8Q/1ONnkByqAxK3eraHySQ EqjUALOWu5dp767b4STj7BK8v6EDtwiBTikfLt0HR3sKHWSD/sPrrR0Xw GpSiMd6JrCfVSuB7f7DAifoa2af8u54SATIlpzoVlhK+6g752oUhqwBlr cpnEDczev/4D0LUkfusuIXQe1ZjIrsY1lTs/MXBEA4dzo+rK1EZDf90Zn ThmigeSwvlpKMr0AxGbpre1ECfwI5n5ZRRv1r5OdKlda0SpODPOL6IcPi xfe7rN6rN7J31sY/mD7X1vWQ/TFyPgAf2aJ86cIEK3irv6AN9MHrSDSDh Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qsiyQ0RqRRaVYmDPecIdoA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fjf4CbUYSzO2xhF9TPcEbw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11610"; a="65163337" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,299,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="65163337" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Nov 2025 04:31:19 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VwBKkr/QSdClLx3bkIHvCQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fVZS0ikbRoCheqNQv8PZmg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,299,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="219945965" Received: from dapengmi-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.124.232.65]) ([10.124.232.65]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Nov 2025 04:31:16 -0800 Message-ID: <11a8a24d-d220-4636-9939-554a8f55062c@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:31:14 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree To: Peter Zijlstra , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Kan Liang , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List References: <20251112154200.4d3671f9@canb.auug.org.au> <20251112093928.GD4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20251112214515.41daf9cc@canb.auug.org.au> <20251112104814.GB3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Language: en-US From: "Mi, Dapeng" In-Reply-To: <20251112104814.GB3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 11/12/2025 6:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 09:45:15PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 10:39:28 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> It appears you're way faster than the build robots :/ >> I was hoping people would put their code through the robots (or some >> local unit testing) before publishing it in their linux-next included >> branches ... ;-) > I do, but sometimes they just take forever :/ And clearly I don't do > i386 builds myself. This issue educates me. I would add i386 arch building into my BAT test list.