From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: firmware merge conflicts
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:52:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212573171.4042.81.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080604160742.e4c66cd4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:07 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the firmware tree got a few conflicts:
>
> Commit 33f1dd02ed25db0790fec8a62b008c71831c49d9 ("ti_usb: kick firmware
> into user space") from the usb tree against commit
> e009cdbc2e96e72fe84df7cf014abcd7a7eb7dc7 ("ti_usb_3410_5052: use
> request_firmware()") from the firmware tree. These seem to have similar
> goals but are using different methods. This affected the files
> drivers/usb/serial/Kconfig,
> drivers/usb/serial/{ti_fw_3410.h,ti_fw_5052.h,ti_usb_3410_5052.c}. I
> have used the firmware tree version for now.
I think that's the right choice; the main difference is the fact that my
version rips out the built-in firmware capability completely, and uses
the firmware loader unconditionally -- which is what we want. Alan?
http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/firmware-2.6.git?a=commitdiff;h=7eb1c508575d0e1c98e8560f8215d35b10e6cd7a#patch4
> Some simple conflicts in sound/Kconfig due to commit
> bd7d34e759d7537b42cffb7205b7b50dda6535bb ("sound: Convert to menuconfig")
> from the sound tree.
>
> Simple conflicts in sound/pci/maestro3.c and
> sound/pci/ymfpci/ymfpci_main.c because "maestro3: treat firmware data as
> const" and "ymfpci: treat firmware data as const" appear in both the
> driver-core tree and the firmware tree. The conflicts are because the
> firmware tree further modifies these files.
>
> So, you and Alan need to come to an agreement about ti_usb (and inform
> Greg :-)). And you should probably ask Greg to drop the to "const"
> patches (or maybe the other way around).
I don't mind much. I was kind of hoping we might sneak the 'const' thing
into 2.6.26 since it's fairly straightforward and should help to stop
people adding more drivers which don't treat fw->data as const.
But then again, that's what linux-next is for too, isn't it?
Greg, want to either push the const changes to Linus or drop them? I
think I've picked up your extra ones, including the iSight one now that
that driver is upstream.
--
dwmw2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-04 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-04 6:07 linux-next: firmware merge conflicts Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-04 9:27 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-06-04 9:56 ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-04 10:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-04 10:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-04 9:52 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1212573171.4042.81.camel@shinybook.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).