From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:07:58 -0500 Message-ID: <1215468479.3274.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080707222528.280f0b9e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1215441589.3274.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1215468350.8970.129.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:59852 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755626AbYGGWIF (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:08:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1215468350.8970.129.camel@pasglop> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Robert Jennings , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-scsi On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 08:05 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 09:39 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > Caused because commit 341b56db6804040aa9559e913865108424e3b18b > > ("[SCSI] > > > ibmvscsi: driver enablement for CMO"), which was 15/16 in a series, > > has > > > been merged before any of the other patches in the series. I have > > > reverted that commit. > > > > Do I detect the fact that IBM sent a patch for a SCSI driver for which > > the core features weren't yet enabled (and which I couldn't check, not > > having a ppc build system)? > > I suspect the sender (Robert) was asking for comments/review :-) In any > case, Robert, next time make it explicit on a patch CCed to a separate > list from the rest of the serie that it isn't to be merged without > dependencies. > > James, if you ack it, I'll put it in powerpc.git. I thought it was all done and dusted (which is why I put it in scsi-misc). However, now Brian King seems to have some late arriving comments. James