From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:48:42 +1000 Message-ID: <1215470922.8970.150.camel@pasglop> References: <20080707222528.280f0b9e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1215441589.3274.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1215468350.8970.129.camel@pasglop> <1215468479.3274.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:54593 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757998AbYGGWtA (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:49:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1215468479.3274.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Bottomley Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Robert Jennings , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-scsi On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 17:07 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > I thought it was all done and dusted (which is why I put it in > scsi-misc). However, now Brian King seems to have some late arriving > comments. There are comments on the whole serie yup, I haven't put it in the tree yet. Cheers, Ben.