From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ian <spyro@f2s.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:29:27 +0100
Message-ID: <1217950167.18866.26.camel@wirenth>
References: <20080805150947.ee63424a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	 <1217941394.18866.19.camel@wirenth>  <20080805130900.GB6335@caravaggio>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mk-outboundfilter-6-a-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.16]:32102
	"EHLO mk-outboundfilter-6-a-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1761582AbYHEPjc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:39:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20080805130900.GB6335@caravaggio>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 15:09 +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> 
> > Should I redo the two drivers patchsets, or would you prefer a patch
> > fixing this after the fact?
> No worries, I'll fix the Kconfigs later today.

Awesome, thanks!