From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:14:48 +0300
Message-ID: <1218615288.7813.310.camel@penberg-laptop>
References: <20080813152907.b76a06e3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	 <20080813073205.GA398@elte.hu> <48A28DD9.7010108@cs.helsinki.fi>
	 <20080813075808.GA11645@elte.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:42319 "EHLO
	mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753718AbYHMIOq (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:14:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20080813075808.GA11645@elte.hu>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>

Hi Ingo,

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 09:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> (This would be doable and pretty painless as long as slab.git is
> purely append-only and not rebased.)

Heh, it's not, as I never quite understood the workflow for that. But
that's another discussion, I suppose.

		Pekka