From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for September 13 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:33:10 -0500 Message-ID: <1221319990.3516.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:58939 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752768AbYIMPdN (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:33:13 -0400 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Cc: Stephen Rothwell Actually, there's a grave problem with this tree in that it's missing 90% of the SCSI tree for upstream. Until this can be fixed, could people test this merge candidate tree instead: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jejb/merge-tree/ 2.6.27-rc6-mc1 contains all of linux-next-20080913 plus all the missing bits. There's also a corresponding git tree here: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/jejb/merge-tree/.git The reason we need this done is because the SCSI patches could do with a thorough test run, particularly in the areas of block layer timers and the new target reset infrastructure. There's a cron job running that will build a new merge candidate tree nightly (in the above directory) from whatever the latest incarnation of linux-next is, so it will give daily snapshots. Thanks, James