From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: testing (Was: Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:19:35 +1100 Message-ID: <1229991575.4360.31.camel@pasglop> References: <20081223012545.5b1e7f5e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1229979392.4360.15.camel@pasglop> <20081223100456.bb556b19.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:49487 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750900AbYLWATz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:19:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081223100456.bb556b19.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Kumar Gala , Hollis Blanchard On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 10:04 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > So, why is this series in powerpc/next at all if some of the modified > files haven't even been compiled? Because nobody spotted the problem while the series was out for review ? > A simple ppc44x_defconfig build of the > powerpc/next tree fails - which I would have thought would be part of the > testing since KVM is only implemented for 44x on powerpc. > > (Sorry, I am annoyed - it was late when I finally found this build > failure on top of everything else.) I have about 3 44x configs in my build tests. KVM happens not to be enabled in any of them :-( I'll add this ppc4xx_defconfig to the lot, I didn't know it existed in fact. Cheers, Ben.