From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:25:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1235118322.29813.24.camel@penberg-laptop> References: <20090220165728.7f2cec61.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:49608 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753681AbZBTIZY (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:25:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090220165728.7f2cec61.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 16:57 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the slab tree got a conflict in mm/slub.c > between commit 5b882be4e00e53a44f47ad7eb997cac2938848bf ("kmemtrace: SLUB > hooks") from the ftrace tree and commit > 8573e12414365585bfd601dc8c093b3efbef8854 ("SLUB: Do not pass 8k objects > through to the page allocator") from the slab tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Looks good to me! Thanks once again Stephen!