Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next

[reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>]

On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 11:01 -0700, Chatre, Reinette wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 01:00 -0700, Nico -telmich- Schottelius wrote:
> > reinette chatre [Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:32:22AM -0700]:
> > > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 10:30 -0700, John W. Linville wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 03:20:03PM +0100, Nico -telmich- Schottelius wrote:
> > > > > John W. Linville [Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:44:07PM -0400]:
> > > > > > Any chance you'd like to try wireless-testing to help to isolate
> > > > > > possible sources of this problem?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git
> > > > > 
> > > > > v2.6.29-rc7-17155-g2f7ab92 looks good (as in: wlan works after several
> > > > > suspends and resumes). But it seems you do not add the full kernel version:
> > > > > 
> > > > > sgnx20002:/home/nico/wireless-testing# git describe
> > > > > v2.6.29-rc7-17155-g2f7ab92
> > > > > sgnx20002:/home/nico/wireless-testing# uname -r
> > > > > 2.6.29-rc7-wl-ikn
> > > > > 
> > > > > Which is the kernel built some seconds before.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know where you get the -ikn bits from, presumably from the
> > > > iwlwifi project.  Given what you said above, it would seem you are
> > > > getting your suspend/resume problems from them as well... :-(
> > > 
> > > In our repo we do not add anything to the value of localversion. We also
> > > track wireless-testing _very_ closely so the differences are at most a
> > > handful of patches. Could you please send me commit id of iwlwifi-2.6
> > > repo that fails as well as the commit id of wireless-testing repo that
> > > succeeds?
> > 
> > As I did before in this thread:
> > 
> >   vmlinuz-2.6.29-rc7-wl-ikn-32831-g98c5597 from iwlwifi-2.6: fails
> >   2.6.29-rc7-wl-ikn or v2.6.29-rc7-17155-g2f7ab92 from wireless-testing: works
> 
> I am sorry that I missed this information in the thread.
> 
> > 
> > Btw, I'm running 2.6.29-rc7-next-20090306-ikn currently, which also looks good.
> 
> Your wireless-testing repository tested is much newer than the
> iwlwifi-2.6 one ... new patches for our driver is in your
> wireless-testing repo but not in iwlwifi-2.6. So, in your testing
> wireless-testing contains more up to date iwlwifi code than the
> iwlwifi-2.6 repo.
> 
> Could you please test with today's versions of the two repos? There is a
> one small patch difference.

The difference is not just one patch anymore ... could you please run
your test with yesterday's version of the two repositories?

Thank you very much

Reinette