From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 30: [BUG] kmemleak page fault Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:08:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1238688515.28457.120.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20090330200145.8d0da09b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090330122437.GA4784@traven> <1238578208.14550.4.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> <20090401095207.GH8877@traven> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([193.131.176.58]:37987 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755868AbZDBQJT (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:09:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090401095207.GH8877@traven> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 11:52 +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > El Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:30:08AM +0100 Catalin Marinas ha dit: > > > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 14:24 +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > linux-next 20090330 causes the following page fault on an edb9302 > > > (ARM) like board: > > [...] > > > the fault is reproducible and happens some seconds after having > > > finished the boot process. please tell me if you need more information > > > (like the .config, ...) in order to track this down > > > > Yes, the .config would be useful. I'm mainly interested in which slab > > allocator you are using. I'm testing kmemleak mainly on ARM and haven't > > seen any issues. > > attached is the .config for linux-next 20090401, which should be > roughly the same than the 20090330 one. > > some hours ago i booted the board with 20090401 and the page fault > didn't happen Do you still get this fault with the latest linux-next? I can't reproduce it on my ARM platform (I tried it with the latest mainline kernel as well). -- Catalin