From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: linux-next: IO BAR sizing warning Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:39:29 +1000 Message-ID: <1244756369.5739.51.camel@pasglop> References: <20090506143007.c0ef2340.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A013A70.30101@kernel.org> <20090506092418.3fffab6b@hobbes> <20090506110034.3c7d6e67@hobbes> <20090603164954.2a7aa3f4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090611120739.012a0306@jbarnes-g45> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:38248 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753553AbZFKVkf (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:40:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090611120739.012a0306@jbarnes-g45> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "Wilcox, Matthew R" , Yinghai Lu , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 12:07 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > I am still getting the original warning. For reference, the following > > architectures will probably have the same: > > > > ia64: 0xffffffffffffff > > powerpc: ~(0UL) > > sparc64: 0xffffffffffffffffUL > > Any comments here Ben? Seems this define is overloaded... Ah, forgot to look at that. Will do ASAP. Cheers, Ben.