From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:46:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245138364.3415.39.camel@penberg-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090616074446.GA10278@elte.hu>
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 15:46 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in mm/slub.c
> > > between commit 964cf35c88f93b4927dbc4e950dfa4d880c7f9d1 ("SLUB: Fix early
> > > boot GFP_DMA allocations") from the slab tree and commit
> > > 18fd427debcf37c06917b55295df682fd05fee76 ("slub: add hooks for
> > > kmemcheck") from the tip tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> >
> > Looks good! Thanks.
>
> Btw., this SLAB commit is for this merge window, right?
Yes, it's a fix for SLUB that's going to be part of the next pull
request (probably out today or tomorrow).
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-16 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 5:46 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-16 5:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-16 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 7:46 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
[not found] <20090706144051.06d079a5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2009-07-06 8:01 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <20090914155219.13118819.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2009-09-14 6:35 ` Pekka Enberg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-23 3:44 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-23 9:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-09-23 9:46 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-21 3:48 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-21 7:24 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245138364.3415.39.camel@penberg-laptop \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox