From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:01:07 +0300 Message-ID: <1246867267.4957.5.camel@penberg-laptop> References: <20090706144051.06d079a5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:55901 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752425AbZGFIBE (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:01:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090706144051.06d079a5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Nick Piggin On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 14:40 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in > include/linux/rcupdate.h between commit > 249acdd3fd13d1ec579ff9b1c5273cf5515cd352 ("SLQB slab allocator (try 2)") > from the slab tree and commit 03b042bf1dc14a268a3d65d38b4ec2a4261e8477 > ("rcu: Add synchronize_sched_expedited() primitive") from the tip tree. > > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as > necessary. Yup, looks good to me. Thanks, Stephen!