From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:14:55 +0300 Message-ID: <1247210095.20721.362.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090701135247.27488.10776.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1246846628.5743.2.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1247205588.20721.353.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247206539.6630.0.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <4A56DD51.5040703@gmail.com> <1247209961.6630.3.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:59563 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750787AbZGJHWM (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:22:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1247209961.6630.3.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, carolyn.j.smith@exgate.tek.com, Stephen Rothwell , Jim Cromie , linux-kernel , Linuxppc-dev , Sachin P Sant , linux-next , Scott Wood , dwmw2@infradead.org, Balbir Singh On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 12:42 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:18 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > Subrata Modak wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 08:59 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > >> On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 07:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> Is there somebody else whom i should also address to get an att= ention > > >>> for this patch ? I apolozise if i have not included someone. Ki= ndly > > >>> connect to the concerned. > > >> I'm putting your patch to l2-mtd-2.6.git. > > >=20 > > > Thanks very much. Would i receive some automatic confirmation onc= e it > > > make to Linus tree ? > >=20 > > I do not think so. I'm not MTD maintainer and in l2-mtd-2.6.git > > I just collect random patches, which the maintainer then usually > > takes from my tree. >=20 > Thanks. I just want this through before 2.6.31 stable is released, so > that the build fails does not occur on next trees based on that stabl= e > one. Then you should bug dwmw2. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)