From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: linux-next: slab tree build failure Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:43:46 +0300 Message-ID: <1252309426.4964.3.camel@penberg-laptop> References: <20090907153723.0c984c83.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <84144f020909062310u37ecdddfw31c6cc9a22ccabd9@mail.gmail.com> <20090907173108.3c0148d7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:50980 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751444AbZIGHnq (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2009 03:43:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090907173108.3c0148d7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "John W. Linville" , Catalin Marinas , npiggin@suse.de Hi Stephen, On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:10:18 +0300 Pekka Enberg wrote: > > AFAICT, you're interested in kmemleak.git, not slab.git. Catalin? On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 17:31 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I first got the error after merging the slab tree ... the kmemleak tree > is merged much later. Aah, let me guess, CONFIG_SLQB? I guess I'll just rebase the damn tree and make it non-default. We need that anyway if we want to merge it to 2.6.32. I'll take a stab at it later this evening (my time zone). Pekka