From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:35:33 +0300
Message-ID: <1252910133.5934.3.camel@penberg-laptop>
References: <20090706144051.06d079a5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	 <20090914155219.13118819.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:34267 "EHLO
	mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750891AbZINGfb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:35:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20090914155219.13118819.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 15:52 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
> 
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:40:51 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> > include/linux/rcupdate.h between commit
> > 249acdd3fd13d1ec579ff9b1c5273cf5515cd352 ("SLQB slab allocator (try 2)")
> > from the slab tree and commit 03b042bf1dc14a268a3d65d38b4ec2a4261e8477
> > ("rcu: Add synchronize_sched_expedited() primitive") from the tip tree.
> > 
> > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.
> 
> This conflict is now between the slab tree and Linus' tree.

OK, thanks Stephen, I'll fix it up in my tree.