From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] nfs: fix ISO C90 warning Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:58:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1261087093.4080.36.camel@localhost> References: <20091215165309.58e98eea.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091216142334.6a0ba115.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <1261003219.13878.6.camel@localhost> <20091216144700.34b80b4b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <1261004497.13878.9.camel@localhost> <2375c9f90912170200m12a5310cg90343c5c1081fbb8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2375c9f90912170200m12a5310cg90343c5c1081fbb8-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, LKML , linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 18:00 +0800, Am=C3=A9rico Wang wrote:=20 > Hi, > Check that currently all usages of RPC_DEBUG are the same, > we can replace them all. >=20 > What do you think about the attached patch? >=20 > Sorry for attaching it, I have a bad mail environment here. >=20 > Signed-off-by: WANG Cong Doesn't that approach instead lead to a lot of 'unreferenced variable' warnings in the '#undef RPC_DEBUG' case? Cheers Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html