From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix unused variable warning on UP (was: Re: linux-next: tip tree build warning) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:58:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1265572738.12224.278.camel@laptop> References: <10f740e81002071157p11b78784i8091d4790c29f30d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:38303 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754980Ab0BGT7Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 14:59:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <10f740e81002071157p11b78784i8091d4790c29f30d@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 20:57 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 08:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig) produced this warning: > > > > kernel/sched.c: In function 'wake_up_new_task': > > kernel/sched.c:2631: warning: unused variable 'cpu' > > > > Introduced by commit fabf318e5e4bda0aca2b0d617b191884fda62703 ("sched: > > Fix fork vs hotplug vs cpuset namespaces"). > > And now we have it in 2.6.33-rc7, too... > Patch below (FWIW, compile-tested on m68k with CONFIG_SMP=n only). > > --- > From cbf4f334632ade9c5ed9b88728ec82af074e4ace Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Geert Uytterhoeven > Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 20:47:30 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] sched: Fix unused variable warning on UP > > Fix warning > > | kernel/sched.c:2650: warning: unused variable 'cpu' > > if CONFIG_SMP is not set. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > kernel/sched.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c > index 3a8fb30..c47561e 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched.c > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > @@ -2647,9 +2647,10 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, > unsigned long clone_flags) > { > unsigned long flags; > struct rq *rq; > - int cpu = get_cpu(); > > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > + int cpu = get_cpu(); > + > /* > * Fork balancing, do it here and not earlier because: > * - cpus_allowed can change in the fork path Which introduces a preempt imbalance... I like akpm's fix much better.