From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Walker Subject: Re: FW: next build fails Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:08:55 -0700 Message-ID: <1284674935.2411.54.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> References: <33A307AF30D7BF4F811B1568FE7A9B18043784FF99@EXDCVYMBSTM006.EQ1STM.local> <20100916164442.df749cc1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1284656407.2411.5.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100917075242.e0bc4b54.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1284674337.2411.53.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100917080439.7c35775a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fifo99.com ([67.223.236.141]:58257 "EHLO fifo99.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753195Ab0IPWJQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:09:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100917080439.7c35775a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Sundar R IYER , Linus WALLEIJ , Russell King , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 08:04 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:58:57 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > Yeah, exactly .. This is what I did to update my patch .. Do you want to > > include this, or should I update my version and my tree.. Ultimately my > > version has to go into Russell's tree.. > > Well, you can't really update that in your tree until after your tree is > merged with Russell's, right (since ALT_UP etc are not defined in your > tree)? In that case, I need to do the fix when I merge your tree into > linux-next (and so with Russell's tree). Right, I see what your saying .. Ok, thanks. Daniel