From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 27 (drivers/target) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:49:39 -0800 Message-ID: <1293490179.4649.208.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> References: <20101227170451.a9a9f873.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101227115755.ffcdfc4f.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101227115755.ffcdfc4f.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , scsi , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 11:57 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:04:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > [The mirroring on kernel.org is running slowly] > > > > Changes since 20101221: > > > > Linus' tree lost its build failure. > > > Hi Nick, > > Please test building target code when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled. > > When CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, drivers/target/ gets a boat load of build errors. > > Should TCM_IBLOCK depend on BLOCK? That fixes lots of the build errors, > but not all of them. > > > The header file include/target/target_core_base.h uses struct queue_limits, > so it should #include . > > Added the missing include here: target: Add linux/blkdev.h include in target_core_base.h http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=e8bd07d3a525e71b424d308fc5084b89a6456bb2 Thanks Randy! --nab