From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slab tree Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:32:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1296502339.30654.13.camel@jaguar> References: <20110131144246.dfa2abe3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:42161 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753553Ab1AaTcn (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:32:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110131144246.dfa2abe3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Tso On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 14:42 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the slab tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'ext4_exit_mballoc': > fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2750: error: implicit declaration of function 'kmem_cache_name' > fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2750: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size > > Caused by commit 63310467a3d1ed6a0460ec1f4268126cd1ceec2e ("mm: Remove > support for kmem_cache_name()"). Clearly the last user has not gone, yet. > > I have used the version of the slab tree from next-20110121 for today. Christoph, Ted? Should I revert the patch from slab.git?