From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A47C06508 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A1D20644 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="dCUhd3Vw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728264AbfFKSaT (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:30:19 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:58272 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727748AbfFKSaT (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:30:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SRqwQ9Cq+VPPpQF4UBPOMXEl0SwrucZG3aVfiVN5Xaw=; b=dCUhd3Vwk6n2kdZ6NtCrgg1uAD nemybzhK0ahpNgOXaBV+1o8Hdjlfrpbs4HHUuBRROanNgi+e+OzlULEk+t0+KOR2WeA54ZM1P5BYk AhEasXPyNPyNJGtgztMZd886ilZDFBBNczr3V197/tEC/RCeSvc+kUK+GtOTLuA5amEBOlnjN9y+l uY1Dm2hPs7CmyvHxZXM+ITYJEoaNYwijCnIsXyS8A6kgTudCsflg6QVOkYLLalfUFL4IOq8M/Ws0A NgFx0rMOv1VY3QaQ9/OtjnXfeglsCCdNM0h0noxnjfnfQ0DWgwFC5r8o+0XYZgoFBrmumhTNxvJ9o ijwn/HOQ==; Received: from static-50-53-52-16.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net ([50.53.52.16] helo=dragon.dunlab) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1halXE-0006et-ME; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:30:16 +0000 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 11 (net/dsa/tag_sja1105.c) To: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Vladimir Oltean References: <20190611192432.1d8f11b2@canb.auug.org.au> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <12e489ae-d3d9-0390-dee7-0da6301fdcf8@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:30:14 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190611192432.1d8f11b2@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On 6/11/19 2:24 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190607: > on i386: # # Library routines # # CONFIG_PACKING is not set ld: net/dsa/tag_sja1105.o: in function `sja1105_rcv': tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x40b): undefined reference to `packing' ld: tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x423): undefined reference to `packing' ld: tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x43e): undefined reference to `packing' ld: tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x456): undefined reference to `packing' ld: tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x471): undefined reference to `packing' Should this driver select PACKING? -- ~Randy