From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
To: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:29:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305120583.3277.14.camel@odin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9185B06E-E2C4-4F35-8605-9654CA3BA966@slimlogic.co.uk>
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 01:43 -0500, Jorge Eduardo Candelaria wrote:
> On May 10, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi Jorge,
> >
> > On Tue, 10 May 2011 12:30:36 -0500 Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> On May 10, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:44 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>> Hi Liam,
> >>>>
> >>>> After merging the voltage tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >>>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> ERROR: "tps65910_gpio_init" [drivers/mfd/tps65910.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "tps65910_irq_init" [drivers/mfd/tps65910.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "irq_modify_status" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "irq_set_chip_and_handler_name" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "handle_edge_irq" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined!
> >>>>
> >>>> I have used the voltage tree from next-20110509 for today.
> >>>
> >>> Jorge, could you send a fix for this today.
> >>
> >> The following patch should solve this:
> >>
> >> From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> >> MFD: Fix TPS65910 build
> >>
> >> Support for tps65910 as a module is not available. The driver can
> >> only be compiled as built-in. OTOH, the regulator driver can still
> >> be built as module without breaking the compilation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> >
> > Today (even with the above patch included) I got these errors from the
> > x86_64 allmodconfig build:
> >
> > tps65910.c:(.text+0xf4140): undefined reference to `i2c_master_send'
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_read':
> > tps65910.c:(.text+0xf41d2): undefined reference to `i2c_transfer'
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_init':
> > tps65910.c:(.init.text+0xcb83): undefined reference to `i2c_register_driver'
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_exit':
> > tps65910.c:(.exit.text+0x6e0): undefined reference to `i2c_del_driver'
> >
> > I have used the voltage tree from next-20110509 again today.
>
> Following patch should fix the dependency problems. Please review:
>
> From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> [PATCH] MFD: TPS65910: Fix I2C dependency
>
> TPS65910 driver can only be compiled built-in, so the I2C driver
> should be as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> index c78865e..0131d49 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> @@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ config MFD_OMAP_USB_HOST
>
> config MFD_TPS65910
> bool "TPS65910 Power Management chip"
> - depends on I2C && GPIOLIB
> + depends on I2C=y && GPIOLIB
> select MFD_CORE
> help
> if you say yes here you get support for the TPS65910 series of
Now applied.
Liam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-10 2:44 linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-10 8:38 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-05-10 17:30 ` Jorge Eduardo Candelaria
2011-05-10 19:57 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-05-11 2:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-11 6:43 ` Jorge Eduardo Candelaria
2011-05-11 13:29 ` Liam Girdwood [this message]
2011-05-11 8:47 ` [PATCH] mfd: TPS65910 depends on I2C and must be built in Mark Brown
2011-05-11 13:35 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-05-11 13:36 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-15 2:09 linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-15 9:04 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-12-15 14:03 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-14 4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-14 5:10 ` Yong Shen
2010-12-14 15:56 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-12-15 2:03 ` Yong Shen
2010-11-11 0:36 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-11 11:46 ` Mark Brown
2010-11-11 12:09 ` Liam Girdwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305120583.3277.14.camel@odin \
--to=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=jedu@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).