From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@gaisler.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc tree
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:24:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305897896.2466.7235.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD66328.4010603@gaisler.com>
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:48 +0200, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] SCHED_TTWU_QUEUE is not longer needed since sparc32 now implements IPI
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@gaisler.com>
> Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Yep, this looks fine, please merge this patch through whatever tree
carries the sparc32-smp work.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> init/Kconfig | 5 -----
> kernel/sched.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index df64627..a66b656 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -827,11 +827,6 @@ config SCHED_AUTOGROUP
> desktop applications. Task group autogeneration is currently
> based
> upon task session.
>
> -config SCHED_TTWU_QUEUE
> - bool
> - depends on !SPARC32
> - default y
> -
> config MM_OWNER
> bool
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index c62acf4..0516af4 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2564,7 +2564,7 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
> {
> struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_SCHED_TTWU_QUEUE)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> if (sched_feat(TTWU_QUEUE) && cpu != smp_processor_id()) {
> ttwu_queue_remote(p, cpu);
> return;
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-20 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-17 3:14 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-19 13:37 ` Daniel Hellstrom
2011-05-19 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 6:07 ` Daniel Hellstrom
2011-05-20 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 12:48 ` Daniel Hellstrom
2011-05-20 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-05-20 2:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-28 6:38 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305897896.2466.7235.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=daniel@gaisler.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox