From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mimi Zohar Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the security-testing tree Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:48:29 -0400 Message-ID: <1312940909.2611.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20110810105840.cb0b3ac63c84b51b98029d8c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:49189 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750804Ab1HJBsd (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 21:48:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110810105840.cb0b3ac63c84b51b98029d8c@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: James Morris , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:58 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi James, > > After merging the security-testing tree, today's linux-next build > (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c: In function 'reiserfs_security_init': > fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c:69:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_old_inode_init_security' > > Caused by commit 9d8f13ba3f48 ("security: new > security_inode_init_security API adds function callback"). Forgotten > include? > > I have used the security-testing tree from next-20110809 for today. No, I left out the stub definition in the include. James, how do you want me to correct this and the missing 'inline'? Should I be updating the original patches or submitting them as new patches? thanks, Mimi