From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the 4xx tree with the powerpc tree Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:41:42 +1100 Message-ID: <1323405702.19891.7.camel@pasglop> References: <20111209123811.12cf28971f21a309976f31bb@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:48909 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750854Ab1LIEmJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2011 23:42:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Josh Boyer Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Tanmay Inamdar On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Josh, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the 4xx tree got a conflict in > > arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/ppc40x_simple.c between commit 11eab297f57b > > ("powerpc: Add support for OpenBlockS 600") from the powerpc tree and > > commit d5b9ee7b514e ("powerpc/40x: Add APM8018X SOC support") from the > > 4xx tree. > > I blame BenH. I sent him a pull request with d5b9ee7b514e in it > before he went and updated his tree. Still not pulled afaik. Guess > I'll be rebasing my next branch tomorrow to pick up a series from Tony > Breeds, unless Ben handles the outstanding pull before I wake up :). Don't bother rebasing, I can deal with a minor merge conflict like that :-) > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. > > Looks correct to me. Hopefully you won't have to carry it long. > > > > [Josh: I have changed you contact address to the above] Cheers, Ben.