From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:20:09 +0000 Message-ID: <1332490809.2801.2.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> References: <20120323130031.c097ca3755de5ff5879504e1@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:33034 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753785Ab2CWIUN (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2012 04:20:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120323130031.c097ca3755de5ff5879504e1@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jeff Garzik On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 13:00 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi James, > > After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/ata/sata_svw.c: In function 'k2_sata_proc_open': > drivers/ata/sata_svw.c:327:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > drivers/ata/sata_svw.c:327:56: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int') > drivers/ata/sata_svw.c:328:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] That's defined in linux/proc_fs.h What was the config? Was it a no-PROCFS config, or is this just something that needs to be explicitly included? James