From: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
To: james@namei.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Cc: eparis@redhat.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] samples/seccomp: fix dependencies on arch macros
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:50:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334796625-26830-1-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> (raw)
This change fixes the compilation error triggered here for
i386 allmodconfig in linux-next:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/6123842/
Logic attempting to predict the host architecture has been
removed from the Makefile. Instead, the bpf-direct sample
should now compile on any architecture, but if the architecture
is not supported, it will compile a minimal main() function.
This change also ensures the samples are not compiled when
there is no seccomp filter support.
(Note, I wasn't able to reproduce the error locally, but
the existing approach was clearly flawed. This tweak
should resolve your issue and avoid other future weirdness.)
Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
---
samples/seccomp/Makefile | 12 +++---------
samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/seccomp/Makefile b/samples/seccomp/Makefile
index e8fe0f5..16aa2d4 100644
--- a/samples/seccomp/Makefile
+++ b/samples/seccomp/Makefile
@@ -1,27 +1,21 @@
# kbuild trick to avoid linker error. Can be omitted if a module is built.
obj- := dummy.o
-hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SECCOMP) := bpf-fancy dropper
-bpf-fancy-objs := bpf-fancy.o bpf-helper.o
+hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER) := bpf-fancy dropper bpf-direct
HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include
HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include
HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-helper.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include
HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-helper.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include
+bpf-fancy-objs := bpf-fancy.o bpf-helper.o
HOSTCFLAGS_dropper.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include
HOSTCFLAGS_dropper.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include
dropper-objs := dropper.o
-# bpf-direct.c is x86-only.
-ifeq ($(SRCARCH),x86)
-# List of programs to build
-hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SECCOMP) += bpf-direct
-bpf-direct-objs := bpf-direct.o
-endif
-
HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-direct.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include
HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-direct.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include
+bpf-direct-objs := bpf-direct.o
# Try to match the kernel target.
ifeq ($(CONFIG_64BIT),)
diff --git a/samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c b/samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c
index 26f523e..151ec3f 100644
--- a/samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c
+++ b/samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c
@@ -8,6 +8,11 @@
* and can serve as a starting point for developing
* applications using prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 2, ...).
*/
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
+#define SUPPORTED_ARCH 1
+#endif
+
+#if defined(SUPPORTED_ARCH)
#define __USE_GNU 1
#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
@@ -43,8 +48,6 @@
#define REG_ARG3 REG_R10
#define REG_ARG4 REG_R8
#define REG_ARG5 REG_R9
-#else
-#error Unsupported platform
#endif
#ifndef PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS
@@ -174,3 +177,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
payload("Error message going to STDERR\n"));
return 0;
}
+#else /* SUPPORTED_ARCH */
+/*
+ * This sample is x86-only. Since kernel samples are compiled with the
+ * host toolchain, a non-x86 host will result in using only the main()
+ * below.
+ */
+int main(void)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+#endif /* SUPPORTED_ARCH */
--
1.7.5.4
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-19 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-19 0:50 Will Drewry [this message]
2012-04-19 3:44 ` [PATCH] samples/seccomp: fix dependencies on arch macros James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334796625-26830-1-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org \
--to=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=james@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox