From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: CRYPTO_DEV_NX merge problem (Re: linux-next: Tree for July 31) Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 08:15:51 +1000 Message-ID: <1343772951.16975.18.camel@pasglop> References: <20120731152614.de6ebe9e0d4b8fc6645b793a@canb.auug.org.au> <31974.1343714338@neuling.org> <5017DE06.3000103@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <19970.1343772018@neuling.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:56658 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754457Ab2GaWQR (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:16:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <19970.1343772018@neuling.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Michael Neuling Cc: Seth Jennings , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Kent Yoder , anton@samba.org, Herbert Xu On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 08:00 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote: > > OK. Please post the fix as a patch. Anton's patch is already in the > powerpc next tree so it won't be changed/rebased directly. > > I'm not sure who can carry this, since the crypto tree doesn't have > Anton's change and the powerpc tree doesn't have Seth's change. > > sfr: who normally carries it when we have a merge issue like this? > You? There is no powerpc -next tree at this point, Anton patch is either upstream or in no tree. Cheers, Ben.