From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 25 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:47:28 -0700 Message-ID: <1380156448.17366.44.camel@joe-AO722> References: <20130925144329.7d240a6fa2b5782dc8726340@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130925144329.7d240a6fa2b5782dc8726340@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fengguang Wu List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 14:43 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Heads up: I will be having a 3 week break leading up to the kernel > summit. This means that next-20130927 (next Friday) will be the last > linux-next release until next-20131028 (or maybe 29). I presume that > Linus will be up to v3.12-rc7 by then and -rc7 is often the last before > a release ... Please plan accordingly. Hi Stephen. Maybe this is a good time for an experiment. Perhaps it would be interesting if you still had a script running every workday and pushed out the result tree without trying to do any patch conflict resolution yourself. Maybe notify the owners of the trees that conflict and let them work out whatever resolutions that are necessary. I think FengGuang's robot can supply most all the details necessary and maybe you can do a lot less work in the future.